Complete archive of published writing across all domains.
This story isn't about speed for the sake of speed. It's about what happens when friction disappears. AI didn't invent the idea. It didn't decide the architecture, the revenue model, or the constraints. What it did was remove the bottlenecks that had stopped me from shipping for years.
There is a strange pattern you notice if you grew up in the Atari, Nintendo, or PlayStation era. Those early systems did not just entertain us—they trained us. They taught us logic, physics, resource management, experimentation, and the kind of curiosity that asks "what happens if I push this further."
AI today can write code, compose music, and even fly drones—but it still can't truly think. It reacts, predicts, and imitates. But it doesn't perceive. That's the gap between the AI we know and the intelligence that's coming next: Cognitive AI.
We are racing toward Cognitive AI systems designed for continual learning, cross-domain transfer, and meta-learning across a lifetime. Yet this ambition collides directly with the energy obstacle. The next wave of breakthroughs will not come from brute-force compute scaling—it will come from smarter, physics-constrained compute.
The internet is becoming toxic and AI is drinking from the stream. When Meta removed professional fact-checking, it didn't just change how people consume information—it altered how machines learn. Data poisoning, model collapse, and what it means for AI reliability.
